Watch FREE Webinar
From Poly-Agony to Poly Security
Discover The FIVE Pitfalls of Open Relationships and How To Avoid Them!
Uncategorized December 1, 2021
The following content was written by Dr. Elisabeth Sheff, CNM relationship expert. Elisabeth is a trusted friend and contributor to the Leveled Up Love community.
While interest in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) has been skyrocketing for the last 20 years, having an open or otherwise non monogamous relationship is really not a good choice for everyone.
Recent research shows that 1 in 5 people — fully 20% of the population in the US — has tried consensual non monogamy, and 5% have ongoing CNM relationships. If, however, you have never tried CNM before, then how do you know if it is a good fit for you or not?
This post explains the factors that social scientists have identified as important influences on satisfaction or dissatisfaction in CNM relationships and introduces a new relationship test that can help people consider if CNM might work for them or not.
Non monogamy is a type of relationship in which partners agree that they want to be together, but also want to be open-minded about having other partners. Different from monogamous relationships, non monogamy is open to more than just one partner and creates more trust between partners, despite there being multiple.
Non monogamous relationships do not adhere to the same standards as monogamous relationships. Instead, they create their own standards and are more flexible than traditional relationships.
Ethical non monogamy is the practice of taking part of two relationships that are not completely exclusive between two people. In an ethical non monogamous relationship, there is open communication between all involved parties.
Ethical non monogamy can come in many different forms in a relationship. Sometimes there is only one person acting outside of the main relationship, and sometimes it is both people. Ethical non monogamous relationships also do not necessarily have to involve sexual connections, but can also be a romantic connection or both romantic and sexual connections.
Ethical non monogamy is not the same as cheating, as both people in the main relationship are consenting that they are with other people. Both partners have agreed to practice non monogamy. In cheating, the other partner usually does not know their loved one is with another. Hence, why ethical non monogamy revolves around consent and open communication, and why cheating is the opposite.
Scholars identify a few indicators of satisfaction for people who are interested in or attempting consensually non monogamous relationships. People who become polyamorous often have a “faster life history,” earlier puberty, more social and ethical risk-taking, less aversion to germs, and greater interest in short-term mating.
People in non monogamous relationships also tend to be fairly extroverted, with higher levels of conscientiousness and agreeableness and lower levels of neuroticism. Numerous studies have shown that polyamorous and other non monogamous folks tend towards low levels of jealousy and high levels of trust, honesty, intimacy, and relationship satisfaction.
Unsurprisingly, people who are drawn towards polyamory are often more sexually uninhibited, and report having sex more often than monogamous people.
In terms of creating a lasting non monogamous relationship, folks who sustain satisfaction in CNM generally have extensive conflict resolution strategies that foster trust, communication, and relationship satisfaction. Polyamorists who construct relationship agreements that work for everyone involved and then abide by these agreements are more satisfied with each other than are those who break agreements. People whose relationship structure matches their personality and whose mate has the ideal attributes that they seek in a partner are also more satisfied in non monogamous relationships.
For people who are in more than one relationship, all of those relationships tend to be most satisfying when they are all fulfilling participants’ needs, rather than one bad relationship standing out in negative contrast to the others. Furthermore, people with a primary partner see that person as a more desirable long-term mate than their secondary partner and report higher relationship satisfaction overall with their primary partners than their secondary partners.
Some evidence indicates that people in primary relationships are more satisfied with each other when compared with secondary relationships. Balzarini and her colleagues looked at polyamorous people’s satisfaction in primary and secondary relationships and found that primary partners reported less stigma, greater levels of investment, better communication, more frequent sex, and lasted longer than secondary relationships. Secondary partners, in comparison, spent more of their time together having sex, communicated less smoothly, and had less interdependence.
Cumulatively, these researchers’ findings indicate that people who might be inclined towards non monogamy, are freedom-loving risk-takers who are independent, conscientious, agreeable, enjoy novelty, and perhaps a bit horny. Non monogamy-leaning folks also tend to have high levels of trust and low levels of jealousy and are a bit more extroverted than the general population (though some introverts do really well in polycules). Willingness to put effort into relationships is also a hallmark of people drawn to non monogamy, and these folks generally concentrate on communication, conflict resolution, and attention to creating and following relationship agreements.
The most satisfied polycules are those in which all partners are able to match their mutual expectations about their degree of outness, type and quantity of time with each other, distribution of resources, and degree and type of sexual interactions.
The biggest source of dissatisfaction in non monogamous relationships is a desire to be monogamous. There are deeply monogamous people for whom any form of CNM would be not only dissatisfying but actively intolerable.
Additionally, people who prefer very clear and consistent boundaries, have high levels of jealousy or anxiety, and are averse to risk-taking or germaphobes will probably have lower interest and satisfaction in non monogamous relationships.
Non monogamy is an especially bad choice for people who have difficulty keeping agreements and a low desire or capacity to work on conflict resolution and could be especially uncomfortable for people with a strong interest in long-term mating.
This is not to say that people in CNM relationships are not interested in long-term mating, but that those who prefer one-to-one bonding are more likely than CNM folks to desire only relationships with the potential to become serious and exclusive, and do not care for casual relationships that might not ever become something more committed.
People who are already in CNM relationships also encounter things that create dissatisfaction. Polyamorous and other CNM folks are more likely to be dissatisfied in their relationships if they must remain closeted, and it can be especially difficult when they experience a relationship mismatch.
This mismatch usually takes one of three forms:
If a polyamorous person is in one fantastic relationship and another crappy relationship, their satisfaction in the dreadful relationship will plummet as they contrast it with the terrific relationship. Finally, when people feel like the benefits of a CNM relationship are unevenly distributed and favor one person at the expense of someone else, then they are likely to become dissatisfied .
Some people are certain that monogamy is the best form of relationship for them and have no question about what style of emotional, romantic, sexual, and intimate bonding might work best in their lives.
For many others, however, things are not so clear-cut, and the maze of relationship possibilities could seem overwhelming for people who are not sure what might work best for them. They might be wondering where to even begin their exploration of new relationship styles.
Enter the Bonding Project, a new relationship test that helps people to consider how they might want to approach their intimate relationships. Another name for the Bonding Project is the polyamory test.
Through many discussions, the Bonding Project team identified the ways people might bond with each other: one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many, or solo. Because the test measures each person’s results by their degree of comfort, curiosity, caution, or challenge with each bonding style, it provides a detailed assessment of each person’s bonding style, hence why it can be called the polyamory test.
In terms of relationship satisfaction, the polyamory test helps people consider their desires and boundaries in relationships in order to find out what kind of bonding style might work best for them. People scoring high on one-to-many and many-to-many are more likely to find satisfaction in a CNM relationship, whereas people who score highest on one-to-one and low on all others might find it difficult to feel satisfied in a CNM relationship.
If the people in relationships have similar or compatible bonding styles, they are more likely to find satisfaction with each other. Partners whose bonding styles differ significantly may face greater challenges in establishing a mutually satisfactory relationship. Taking the test can be the first step in a conversation with yourself and/or other people about what kinds of relationships you want to create in the coming year.
Discover The FIVE Pitfalls of Open Relationships and How To Avoid Them!
Dear sister, Thank you. Thank you for opening your heart and opening your body for my beloved. Thank you for being vulnerable with him. Thank you for sharing precious moments and organic bliss with him. Thank you for enriching his life. You can give him things I never can; for the simple reason that you are not me.
There is an overlap between kinksters and polyamous individuals. There are similarities among the people who participate in kinky sex and/or polyamory, including their personal attributes like race and education, as well as their shared social attributes that appear on both a personal and community level.
I have predominantly used the umbrella term nonmonogamy when talking about people with multiple partners, but as we saw in Chapter Four, people who are non monogamous can be quite varied in the ways they practice having multiple partners.